0
\$\begingroup\$

The secondary of a transformer with a cap connected across it - should it be considered as a parallel tank circuit or a series one? It looks like parallel, but in reality the voltage rises on it when you drive it at resonance using the primary coil, which is somewhat counter intuitive

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to EE.SE! A schematic would be neat here. \$\endgroup\$
    – winny
    Commented Nov 26, 2018 at 12:20

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

Strictly speaking a tank circuit comprises parallel LC components and not series components. Anyway that is what I was taught but that's besides the point.

When you add a capacitor in parallel with the secondary of a transformer you are more than likely (intentionally or not) producing a resonance with the secondary leakage inductance and, given that the secondary leakage inductance is in series with the induced secondary voltage, you are making a 2nd order low pass filter: -

enter image description here

the voltage rises on it when you drive it at resonance using the primary coil

Yes, this can certainly happen with a 2nd order low pass filter formed from leakage inductance and an added capacitor: -

enter image description here

Also take note that the primary leakage inductance is "lumped together" with the secondary leakage inductance when calculating the total effective leakage inductance and it is this total leakage inductance that should be used when calculating the resonant frequency seen at the secondary.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.