I came across this paragraph in the classic reference Op Amps For Everyone by Ron Mancini where it says on the first page:
Many attempts has been made to make a stable amplifier, but temperature changes and power supply voltage extremes experienced on phone lines caused uncontrollable gain drift. Passive components had much better drift characteristics than active components had, thus if an amplifier's gain could be made dependent on passive components, the program would be solved.
I don't quite get what that means. I'm going to take a few assumptions here and hope someone can confirm or correct my understanding.
Say when there's a voltage applied across a passive resistor, its resistance changes within some specified tolerance as it heats up overtime by the current. Is that why we see or what we call the drift in the input voltage vs. output current?
Let's take a BJT as the active component. Be it configured in common collector, emitter or base amplifier, the only variable in any of the gain equations that is not passive is the \$ \beta \$ or the Hfe. (e.g. \$ A_v = {R_E \over {\alpha r_m + R_E + {R_B \over {\beta + 1}} }} \$ for C.C.). So the volatility or stability of \$ \beta \$ is essentially the main indicator for the drift?
Because the \$ \beta \$ is more unpredictable than heating does to a resistor's resistance, hence the drift characteristic in a passive component is better than an active component?