Combining solder cups with either ferrules or pin terminals seems better. What's the nuanced truth here?
I believe that what you're suggesting is:
- Strip a stranded wire
- Crimp the wire to a ferrule (or a wire pin)
- Solder a solder cup to a PCB
- Place the ferrule/ pin in the solder cup
- Solder it
What's wrong with it? The following:
- That is 5 steps (compared to two steps when soldering a wire directly to a PCB, two steps when using an IDT board-in terminal, or three steps when using a non-IDT board-in terminal)
- It requires three QA inspections (compared to one inspection when soldering a wire directly using a board-in terminal): 1) crimp; 2) PCB solder; 3) ferrule solder.
- The reliability of soldering a ferrule in a solder cup has not been studied and is unknown.
- The reliability of soldering a wire pin in a solder cup is easily estimated to be poor: the weight of the wire will bend the pin and break it at the mid point.
- Solder will penetrate the ferrule/pin and wick up the wire strands, which weakens the wire and, in the presence of vibrations, may break strands.
Therefore, no, combining solder cups with either ferrules or wire pin terminals is not better, it is worse than using a board-in terminal.
Board-in terminals include (my site):
Board-in wire terminals: secured to the wire first, then to the PCB
- Board-in wire terminals thru PCB
- Board-in wire terminals to PCB
- Removable board-in wire terminals
Board-in PCB terminals: secured to the PCB first, then to the wire
- Board-in IDT terminals
- Board-in poke-in terminals
- PCB solder cups, slot terminals
Note that ferrules and wire pins are not in that list: they are not board-in terminals.