1
\$\begingroup\$

I got a laser thermometer to measure the temperature of a wire for my science fair. However, when I attempted to measure the wire, it was too thin and I just measured whatever was behind it. How can I measure the temperature of only the wire?

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • \$\begingroup\$ I can't think of a way to do that, but would wrapping the wire cause any problems? Maybe you could wrap it around a regular thermometer with a metal probe. \$\endgroup\$
    – PeterJ
    Commented Dec 25, 2013 at 2:48
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Infrared thermometer. Laser only shows where you're pointing. Lase is not involved in the actual temperature measurement. Just FYI. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 25, 2013 at 3:18
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If the resistance of the wire is known and somewhat constant, is measuring the current an option? From there you can work out dissipated power and estimate the temperature. \$\endgroup\$
    – jippie
    Commented Dec 25, 2013 at 7:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ @jippie Judging from Sam's other question, he wants to show how resistance changes with temperature. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 27, 2013 at 3:10
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Could you go for a different temperature range, say 500-1100 °C? Then you could use a chart like the one on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescence to judge the temperature. And Nichrome wire. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 2, 2014 at 9:55

4 Answers 4

1
\$\begingroup\$

Judging from the other post, you are designing an experiment, where you want to demonstrate the resistivity at different temperatures. To do that, you need to know the temperature of the wire. You don't necessarily need to self-heat the wire with electricity.

You've chosen a comfortable range of temperatures: between +10°C and +40°C. You can touch this kind of temperature and it shouldn't hurt. However, the room temperature is usually +18°C to +25°C, so you would need some method of chilling to get +10°C.

I would suspend the wire in a container filled with non-conductive liquid**. The container can be large enough to measure with an IR thermometer. You can also have a thermometer immersed in the liquid. Have another container with warm liquid, and another one with chilled liquid. You can move the wire from one container to another and measure the effect. The temperature of the wire will equilibrate with the temperature of the liquid very quickly.

It could make sense to wind the wire on a plastic spool, being careful that the wire doesn't cross itself. Perhaps, you could lay the wire into the thread of a large plastic screw.

** Silicone oil from the drug store, perhaps. You could add some coloring to the liquid to make it look unusual. Deionized water could work too, it has high resistivity.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

The only way you would be able to measure that with an infrared (the laser just shows where you are pointing it) thermometer would be to attach a copper plate to the wire and measure the temperature of that. Because copper is such a great conductor of heat, that would give you near real-time results. Why do you have to use that thermometer, by the way? Couldn't you just attach a temperature sensor to it and save the bother? That would be cheaper and easier.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ A laarge enough bit of copper for the IR thermometer to target would also dissipate heat quite quickly, making the temperature measurement invalid. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 25, 2013 at 7:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ That's true. Like I said, the best way to go would be to ditch the IR thermometer entirely and use a $5 temperature sensor hooked up to something that can read it, probably an arduino with a 7 segment display would be easiest, @PeterBennett \$\endgroup\$
    – felixphew
    Commented Dec 25, 2013 at 22:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ FYI: IR thermometers in general are poor at reading temperature of metals, especially shiny metal. The metal acts more like an IR mirror. Be sure to cover the metal with matte tape, or black matte paint. \$\endgroup\$
    – Bort
    Commented Feb 19, 2019 at 12:13
0
\$\begingroup\$

There are things called pyrometers and at the heart of the device is a photodiode. They can measure the spot temperature of anything they are pointed at but they rely on optical lenses to give a spot focus point.

Maybe, if you got a photodiode with known sensitivity (amps per incident light power) you could work it out by taking a couple of measurements at slightly different short distances. Other than that I'd be tempted to solder a thermocouple to the wire, minimizing the heat taken by the thermocouple. I've soldered them to electronic components in the past and got reasonable results.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Add a reflector behind the wire, preferably bent to a curve to focus the IR light emitted from your wire. Polished copper should work well as it reflects IR nicely but if you can’t get a suitable piece some household alumina foil might work.

If this is not enough, add some shielding that will shield of other potential heat radiating bodies, like humans, from your reflector.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.