1
\$\begingroup\$

say,i have 16-bit DAQ that can read at a rate of 250kSamples/second. What is the voltage resolution for an analog signal with a 2V amplitude? For what value of signal frequency can I safely digitize this signal?

How can we relate bit daq and samplas/second with voltage resolution's amplitude to slove the problem?. For second question i think, it wants us to think about Nyquist frequency, but don't know how to relate those value, either.

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • \$\begingroup\$ What does Nyquist say about sampling? Surely it is in your text book. How many levels can a 16-bit DAC distinguish? If you don't know that last one, then start with the question how many levels does a 1-bit DAC support? 2-bit? 3-bit? ... 16 bit. \$\endgroup\$
    – jippie
    Commented Dec 22, 2015 at 5:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ actually i don't have a text book, can you recommend one? thanks in advance. \$\endgroup\$
    – Kihlaj
    Commented Dec 22, 2015 at 6:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ What does Google say about Nyquist and sampling? \$\endgroup\$
    – jippie
    Commented Dec 22, 2015 at 6:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ Suppose the highest frequency component, in hertz, for a given analog signal is fmax. According to the Nyquist Theorem, the sampling rate must be at least 2fmax, or twice the highest analog frequency component. \$\endgroup\$
    – Kihlaj
    Commented Dec 22, 2015 at 6:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ Are you studying this on your own, then? You are not being asked these questions as part of a class? They sound like textbook questions. People usually try to avoid doing your work for you if you are in a class. \$\endgroup\$
    – user57037
    Commented Dec 22, 2015 at 17:41

1 Answer 1

0
\$\begingroup\$

1) Amplitude has no bearing on the resolution of a waveform. A pure 1KHz wave with a 2V amplitude has the same resolution as a 4V amplitude wave has the same resolution of a 2uV wave. The source wave has "infinite" resolution. I use that in quotes because all real signals have a noise floor which limits their effective resolution.

2) Your DAC (is DAQ a typo?) has a resolution of (Vdd-Vee)/(2^bit depth). That is to say your DAC is limited in how small a change in the signal wave it can actually see. The equation I gave you is the generic form of finding the smallest change in voltage that your DAC can properly distinguish. Your DAC is also limited by the voltage rails it uses. If the signal is larger than the voltage rails than the DAC can't "see" that part of the wave.

3) Nyquist theory states that you must sample MORE THAN two times the frequency of a wave to be able to recover it without aliasing. I.E. using a 1KHz wave as the highest frequency you'd like to recover, you must sample MORE THAN 2000 times per second (>2KHz) to recover the waveform. I'm emphasizing the "MORE THAN" as I see quite a few people who mistakenly think that sampling at exactly twice the rate will recover the signal. If you sample at exactly twice the frequency of the wave you want to capture, you will alias a DC signal. That section of your question confuses me, as DAC's can't READ. They take a digital value and convert it to an analog voltage (or current). However, I've provided and example of how and ADC would react based on sampling rate.

Edit 1: In the problem you were given the maximum sampling rate. Using math inequalities you would simply reverse the example to find your answer. I.E. if the ADC could only sample at 2KHz, then you can only "see" frequencies recorded that were LESS THAN 1KHz.

\$\endgroup\$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.