I'm looking at this circuit in my textbook: There are also equations for this circuit:
\$ u_n(t) = R1\cdot i_1(t) + L_1\frac{di_1(t)}{dt}-M\frac{di_2(t)}{dt} \$
\$u_C(t) = -R_2\ln(i_2(t)+1)-L_2\frac{di_2(t)}{dt}+M\frac{di_1(t)}{dt}\$
I totaly agree with the first equation. But I don't understand, why the second equation looks like this. I would wrote it as: \$u_C(t) = R_2\ln(i_2(t)+1)+L_2\frac{di_2(t)}{dt}-M\frac{di_1(t)}{dt}\$
I see the current \$i_2\$ comming in the opposite direction than voltage \$u_C\$ same as the current \$i_1\$ is comming in the opposite direction than voltage \$u_n\$. So what is the differnce? Is it something about the \$u_n\$ being the source and \$u_C\$ consumed voltage? Could anybody explain?