0
\$\begingroup\$

I previously asked a question about how KVL is used in node analysis. I'm betting that KCL is also used in mesh analysis.

Could someone explain if and how KCL is used in mesh analysis?

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Mesh analysis is essentially the dual of node analysis so the answer should be evident. Hint: the formal KVL equations are in the form of a sum of voltage variables but, to solve for mesh currents, the equations must be written in terms of mesh current variables. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 21, 2014 at 2:18

2 Answers 2

1
\$\begingroup\$

In fact, circuit analysis by the method of the meshes, is not based on the KCL, if not in the KVL.. Suppose the following circuit:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

To perform mesh analysis, we propose the three currents displayed. Keep in mind that these three currents are actually proposed, which does not mean they are the actual currents.

Given these currents, write the KVL to each mesh

$$ V_1 = I_1\cdot R_1 + (I_1 - I_2)\cdot R_2 \\ 0 = (I_1 - I_2)\cdot R_2 + I_2\cdot R_3 + (I_2 - I_3)\cdot R_4 \\ (I_2 - I_3)\cdot R_4 + I_3\cdot R_5 - V_2 = 0 $$

Applying a little algebra, we can rewrite the system of equations as:

$$ I_1\cdot R_{11} - I_2 \cdot R_{12} = V_1\\ -I_1\cdot R_{21} + I_2\cdot R_{22} - I_3\cdot R_{23} = 0\\ -I_2\cdot R_{32} + I_3\cdot R{33} = V_2 $$

Where

$$ R_{11} = R_1 + R_2\qquad R_{22} = R_2 + R_3 + R_4\qquad R_{33}=R_4 + R_5\\ R_{12} = R_{21} = -R_2 \qquad R_{23} = R_{32} = -R_4\qquad R_{13}=R_{31}=0\\ $$

And this system accepts a matrix representation:

$$ \left(\begin{matrix} R_{11} & R_{12} & R_{13}\\ R_{21} & R_{22} & R_{23}\\ R_{31} & R_{32} & R_{33} \end{matrix}\right)\cdot \left(\begin{matrix} I_1\\ I_2\\ I_3 \end{matrix}\right)= \left(\begin{matrix} V_1\\ 0\\ V_2 \end{matrix}\right) $$

Solving this system we find the three current proposed.

But we must not forget that these currents are proposed; for example, if \$I_1\$ give a negative result means that the actual current in the circuit is counterclockwise. Moreover, to find the actual current through \$R_2\$ should subtract the currents \$I_1\$ and \$I_2\$.
You see, an analysis by the method of the mesh, implies apply KVL.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ This doesn't (directly) address the question of "if and how KCL is use in mesh current analysis". \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 21, 2014 at 3:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ @AlfredCentauri You're right, I will make explicit my answer. The circuit analysis for the mesh method, is not based on the KCL. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 21, 2014 at 3:38
1
\$\begingroup\$

Could someone explain if and how KCL is used in mesh analysis?

Yes, it is implicitly used in mesh analysis. Consider the following simple example circuit.

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Formally writing the KVL equations around mesh 1 and 2 yields

$$V_1 = V_{R1} + V_{R3}$$

$$V_{R3} = V_{R2} + V_2$$

But, to solve for the mesh currents \$I_1\$ and \$I_2\$, we must write the voltage variables in terms of the mesh currents.

By Ohm's law, we have

$$V_{R1} = I_1 R_1 $$

$$V_{R2} = I_2 R_2 $$

$$V_{R3} = I_{R3} R_3 $$

However, for \$I_{R3}\$ we must (at least implicitly) apply KCL at the top center node:

$$I_1 = I_{R3} + I_2 \Rightarrow I_{R3} = I_1 - I_2$$

thus

$$V_{R3} = (I_1 - I_2)R_3 $$

Yes, this an almost trivial example but it nonetheless shows that KCL is applied to find the current through circuit elements that share mesh currents.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.