You will not see anything because they are masked by the front end. When you get bit errors, you just skip to a new page. You will just notice the device get smaller, faster.
If you could see them, the failure that you will mostly likely see is soft errors due to noise, but it is different than you think. As the temperature increases, the densities of states expands and thresholds move due to drain-side charge sharing that shortens the effective channel length. This causes problems in clocked systems that gives read errors, but this is not due to the FLASH transistors, but the charge amplifiers.
There are two other scenarios that come to mind for hard errors.
1) You get more charge getting "stuck" in the oxide during injection due to these increased energy levels that would generally not trap the charge. My answer on simulating floating gates has a band diagram for this injection, and just imagine that electron get trapped in the barrier. (a note, this is the behavior that causes things to fail after millions of writes. Increasing the temperature just speeds up the process)
2) The extra energy due to heat will cause a hole to get enough energy to "jump" through the oxide. This makes a literal crater in the oxide. I could create this behavior in the lab, but I had gate control of actual device and a temperature chamber.