0
\$\begingroup\$

In a closed mesh we have:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

The question is to determine the current through the 2nd resistor \$\text{I}_x\$.


My work:

I think of two methodes:

  1. Because the currents that flow into a node must add up to zero, we know that:

$$\text{I}_{\text{R}_1}+\text{I}_x=0=10\cdot10^{-3}+\text{I}_x\space\Longleftrightarrow\space\text{I}_x=-10\cdot10^{-3}\space\text{A}\tag1$$

  1. The voltage across the two resistors must add up to \$10+\left(-5\right)=5\space\text{V}\$, and I lose \$10\cdot10^{-3}\cdot1000=10\space\text{V}\$ across \$\text{R}_1\$ so the thing I've left is \$5-10=-5\space\text{V}\$, so \$\text{I}_x=-\frac{-5}{1000}=\frac{1}{200}=5\space\text{mA}\$

Which of my methods is right?

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Your question is confusing. Are there other components connected where your wires extend to the edge of the schematic? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 31, 2019 at 13:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ElliotAlderson No it is given like I've drawn it, I think it is also confusing \$\endgroup\$
    – guipo
    Commented May 31, 2019 at 13:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ 5 mA is correct. \$\endgroup\$
    – Chu
    Commented May 31, 2019 at 17:49

2 Answers 2

2
\$\begingroup\$

There may be currents entering/leaving the nodes via the spurs. This doesn't matter, you don't need to find these, just solve the isolated mesh with the information given.

  1. \$\small R_2\$ has \$\small 10\: V\$ across it, with + on the left and - on the right.
  2. The \$\small 5\:V\$ source has + on the right and - on the left, since its voltage is -5V.
  3. The voltage across \$\small R_2\$ is \$\small I_x R_2\$ with + at the bottom and - at the top.

Now you can apply KVL to find \$\small I_x\$.

Don't expect KCL to work for this mesh - you have no way of knowing what currents are flowing through the spurs.

You have the correct answer: \$\small I_x = 5\:mA\$

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Nicely explained and helpful. \$\endgroup\$
    – jonk
    Commented May 31, 2019 at 21:45
-1
\$\begingroup\$

Neither of your answers is correct. If \$I_x\$ is -10mA then the total voltage drop across the two resistors is 20V and KVL is violated. If \$I_x\$ is 5mA then KCL is violated at the junction between the two resistors.

Your problem is nonsensical as shown.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ There are currents entering through the other 'spurs'. KVL on the loop means the 10V source and 10V across R1 cancel; and the 5V source must be balanced by 5 mA through R2 \$\endgroup\$
    – Chu
    Commented May 31, 2019 at 17:53
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Chu Then the OP's answer to my first comment above is invalid. I specifically asked if there were other components and the OP said No. If there are no other components there can be no other currents through the "spurs". \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 31, 2019 at 18:10
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Clearly, this is an academic exercise in using the available information to calculate an unknown current. It doesn't matter what's happening at the nodes, there must be currents entering and exiting at the nodes because KCL is not satisfied for the loop. Just apply KVL to the loop and there is only one unknown. \$\endgroup\$
    – Chu
    Commented May 31, 2019 at 18:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Chu Of course it is an academic exercise, but it is a wasted effort if the OP does not understand that there must be other components connected to the given circuit. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 31, 2019 at 19:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.