7
\$\begingroup\$

What is the unit for resonant frequency? where \$\omega_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}\$? Is it just \$HF^{-1}\$?

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Note: Capacitance has units "F," not "C." \$\endgroup\$ – Shamtam Jun 12 '13 at 0:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ There is no "resonant frequency", there is only "resonance frequency": users.ece.gatech.edu/mleach/misc/resonance.html \$\endgroup\$ – Alfred Centauri Jun 12 '13 at 1:56
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @AlfredCentauri except that 'resonant' does not apply to the frequency, but to the construct which is resonating - it is the 'frequency at which the construct is resonant', as such, the 'resonant frequency [of the construct]' is perfectly valid and correct. Also, as a side note, our language evolves through the acceptance of idioms which become common usage. Try insisting that no-one calls a 'vacuum cleaner' a 'Hoover' \$\endgroup\$ – Matt Taylor Jun 12 '13 at 8:11
11
\$\begingroup\$

In the simplest way possible:

L is in henries (H) - \$\Omega \cdot s\$.

C is in farads (F) - \$\dfrac{s}{\Omega}\$

Multiply both and you have \$s^2\$. Take the square root, you have \$s\$. Invert it, you have \$\dfrac{1}{s}\$, that is, \$\frac{rad}{s}\$.

If the expression is written as \$\omega_0 = \dfrac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{LC}}\$ the resonant frequency is in hertz.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ It's actually rad/sec, you need to add an extra factor of 2pi to get to Hz. \$\endgroup\$ – helloworld922 Jun 12 '13 at 0:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ yes, rad/s, thanks thats what i initially thought \$\endgroup\$ – azza Jun 12 '13 at 0:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's rad per second, but in dimensional analysis radians are the same as no unit at all because a radian is the ratio of two lengths. \$\endgroup\$ – The Photon Jun 12 '13 at 2:44
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ But dimensional analysis doesn't tell the whole story, it would for example let you confuse torque with energy. Also compare en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steradian \$\endgroup\$ – starblue Jun 12 '13 at 19:43
2
\$\begingroup\$

From Wiki:

\$H = \Omega s\$ (Wikipedia entry for Henry)

\$F = \dfrac{s}{\Omega}\$ (Wikipedia entry for Farad)

Thus:

\$\dfrac{1}{ \sqrt{HF} } = \dfrac{1}{s} =\$ Hz, as expected for a frequency

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

\$ \omega \$ is "angular frequency" in \$ \frac{rad}{s} \$,

\$ f\$ is natural frequency AKA "frequency" in \$ Hz \$

So your title has an inherent conflict in it, you ask for frequency but talk about \$ \omega \$.

Also Radians are dimensionless so the rad in \$ \frac{rad}{s} \$ is a place holder for a scaling factor.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.