7
\$\begingroup\$

What is the unit for resonant frequency? where \$\omega_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}\$? Is it just \$HF^{-1}\$?

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Note: Capacitance has units "F," not "C." \$\endgroup\$
    – Shamtam
    Commented Jun 12, 2013 at 0:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ There is no "resonant frequency", there is only "resonance frequency": users.ece.gatech.edu/mleach/misc/resonance.html \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 12, 2013 at 1:56
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @AlfredCentauri except that 'resonant' does not apply to the frequency, but to the construct which is resonating - it is the 'frequency at which the construct is resonant', as such, the 'resonant frequency [of the construct]' is perfectly valid and correct. Also, as a side note, our language evolves through the acceptance of idioms which become common usage. Try insisting that no-one calls a 'vacuum cleaner' a 'Hoover' \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 12, 2013 at 8:11

3 Answers 3

11
\$\begingroup\$

In the simplest way possible:

L is in henries (H) - \$\Omega \cdot s\$.

C is in farads (F) - \$\dfrac{s}{\Omega}\$

Multiply both and you have \$s^2\$. Take the square root, you have \$s\$. Invert it, you have \$\dfrac{1}{s}\$, that is, \$\frac{rad}{s}\$.

If the expression is written as \$\omega_0 = \dfrac{1}{2\pi\sqrt{LC}}\$ the resonant frequency is in hertz.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ It's actually rad/sec, you need to add an extra factor of 2pi to get to Hz. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 12, 2013 at 0:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ yes, rad/s, thanks thats what i initially thought \$\endgroup\$
    – azza
    Commented Jun 12, 2013 at 0:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's rad per second, but in dimensional analysis radians are the same as no unit at all because a radian is the ratio of two lengths. \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Commented Jun 12, 2013 at 2:44
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ But dimensional analysis doesn't tell the whole story, it would for example let you confuse torque with energy. Also compare en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steradian \$\endgroup\$
    – starblue
    Commented Jun 12, 2013 at 19:43
2
\$\begingroup\$

From Wiki:

\$H = \Omega s\$ (Wikipedia entry for Henry)

\$F = \dfrac{s}{\Omega}\$ (Wikipedia entry for Farad)

Thus:

\$\dfrac{1}{ \sqrt{HF} } = \dfrac{1}{s} =\$ Hz, as expected for a frequency

\$\endgroup\$
0
2
\$\begingroup\$

\$ \omega \$ is "angular frequency" in \$ \frac{rad}{s} \$,

\$ f\$ is natural frequency AKA "frequency" in \$ Hz \$

So your title has an inherent conflict in it, you ask for frequency but talk about \$ \omega \$.

Also Radians are dimensionless so the rad in \$ \frac{rad}{s} \$ is a place holder for a scaling factor.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.