0
\$\begingroup\$

Please check this PDF https://www.electronicsworld.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2019ewApr-1.pdf.

enter image description here

I really can't understand the need for 12 V supply connected with reverse bias to D2 and D3. Without it also, the op-amp would saturate to 5 V (on current or voltage > than 20 mA or 5 V respectively).

The authors note is:

Dual series Schottky barrier diodes D2 and D3 divert any overcurrent to power supply or ground. LM358P-A

I think I am missing something here :(

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ 6.26V is an oddly specific value for a supply voltage and was probably naively chosen in the hope that it would limit the opamp's output to 5V - which is unlikely to work very well. \$\endgroup\$
    – brhans
    Commented Jul 27, 2023 at 14:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes, perhaps keeping the output swing voltage of this specific op-amp, in mind. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 28, 2023 at 15:12

1 Answer 1

4
\$\begingroup\$

The idea is that if a voltage less than 0V is applied to the input then D3 will conduct and (assuming some source resistance) keep the voltage at the non-inverting input from going so negative that a lot of current flows through the LM358 input to V- pin.

Similarly, D2 would conduct and the 12V supply might sink some current.

In fact this is an amateurish design- D2 will typically do nothing of the kind (because most power supplies can’t sink much current) and both diodes will be quite leaky. D2 is also unnecessary since the input of the LM358 can handle up to 32V even with Vcc=0, and there is an 18V TVS. D3 would be better handled by other means so as not to affect the accuracy (the 1n5819 can leak hundreds of uA up to 10mA depending on temperature and reverse voltage). Just adding a resistor to the input may be sufficient.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Excellent explanation ! So basically that entire branch is irrelevant , right ? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 27, 2023 at 6:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ For normal function, yes. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 27, 2023 at 6:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for the quick response :) ... \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 27, 2023 at 6:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.