0
\$\begingroup\$

I'm trying to induce Quality factor of RLC circuit.

In series, I did it with Frequency responce $$ H(s) = R/(R+sL+1/sC) = (something)/(s^2+2sw_0\zeta+w_0^2)$$ And $$Q=1/2\zeta$$ But I can't find how to induce it in parallel.

\$\endgroup\$
8
  • \$\begingroup\$ Multiply numerator and denominator by sC. \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 14:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ Actually that equation came from RLC series circuit, and I found Quality factor with $$Q=Root(L/C)*1/R$$. I'm trying to find parallel one. \$\endgroup\$
    – user325050
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 15:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ By the way, ee.se uses \$ to start and end inline math. \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 15:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ I tried to use root or divide symbol but failed... I used $$. Do you know how to use them? \$\endgroup\$
    – user325050
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 15:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ You can write \$\sqrt{L/R}\$, for example, to get a square root symbol (\$\sqrt{L/R}\$). \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 16:19

2 Answers 2

0
\$\begingroup\$

If you did the math you would find that the \$2\zeta\omega_0\$ term comes out as \$\frac{1}{CR}\$.

Knowing that \$\omega_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}\$ you can compute zeta as equal to \$\frac{1}{2R}\sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}\$.

You know how to turn zeta into Q so no need to restate that.


Explanation

You have to imagine driving the parallel RLC from a current source because a current source has infinite output impedance and therefore its impedance doesn't alter the circuit values. Next you turn the current source and the parallel resistance of the RLC into a voltage source and series resistor. Again, I stress no impedances or math is harmed in this re-arrangement!

You then can make a sensible TF of the new circuit: -

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

\$H(s) = \dfrac{X_L||X_C}{R + X_L||X_C}\$

Where \$X_L||X_C = \dfrac{\frac{sL}{sC}}{sL + 1/sC} = \dfrac{sL}{1+s^2LC}\$

Stuff it in the formula and you get: -

\$H(s) = \dfrac{sL}{R + s^2LCR + sL}\$

Next, divide through by LCR to get: -

\$H(s) = \dfrac{\frac{s}{CR}}{s^2 + \frac{s}{CR} + \frac{1}{LC}}\$

Now it's in standard form for recognizing that \$\frac{1}{CR} = 2\zeta\omega_0\$. Continue to find zeta as per my original answer.

\$\endgroup\$
11
  • \$\begingroup\$ That one was about series RLC circuit. I'm trying to find parallel quality factor. \$\endgroup\$
    – user325050
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 15:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ My formula IS zeta for a parallel RLC. Do the algebra to simply convert to Q. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 16:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ Sorry, I misunderstood your answer. Your formula is right. How can I induce that formula? \$\endgroup\$
    – user325050
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 16:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'll add explanation to my answer. Give me a few minutes.... \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 16:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'll wait for you. Thx \$\endgroup\$
    – user325050
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 17:04
0
\$\begingroup\$

How did you derive the transfer function for the series circuit? Answer: Complex voltage divider. Why didn`t you try this method also for the parallel combination? Then, if you manipulate the resulting function with the aim to have again a quadratic polynominal in the denominator you can identify the wanted parameter.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ Actually I'm not sure how to make transfer function in parallel RLC circuit. I did it in series $$H(s) = (I*V_R)/(I*V_s)$$ because current is same in series. But how should I do in parallel? \$\endgroup\$
    – user325050
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 15:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ I am afraid, you have a wrong circuit arrangement in mind. I suppose, you speak about voltage-in and voltage-out, correct? So you need a complex voltage divider. \$\endgroup\$
    – LvW
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 15:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ I thought that H(s) is ratio of voltage out and voltage in. Is that incorrect? \$\endgroup\$
    – user325050
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 15:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes - that is the definition. \$\endgroup\$
    – LvW
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 16:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ But in parallel, voltage is same in R, L, C. Then H(s) should be 1? Or parallel RLC circuit use different definition? \$\endgroup\$
    – user325050
    Commented Apr 14, 2016 at 16:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.