2
\$\begingroup\$

We have changed BLDC motor suppliers and are seeing a new problem. In the old system the software commanded the motor to move 5 steps of X hall counts then stop. With exactly the same electronics and software but with the new motor (which may have different hall sensors), the motor moves it's 5 steps but at a much reduced speed. We just got the motors today and don't have the full specs on it yet. Any ideas as to what could be causing the problem? I've attached 3 pics. The first one shows a scope trace on the U phase hall sensor output of the original good motor. The 2nd pic shows the same hall sensor output on the new problematic motor. The third pic shows the circuit diagram. The hall sensors are connected to J9 at the right of the diagram. J10 is the motor connector.

Thanks a great deal for any help, Fred

U sensor, old motor

U sensor, new motor

circuit diagram

hall interface closeup

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • \$\begingroup\$ Did you happen to notice if it moved in the expected direction? Maybe the winding/sensor phases are scrambled relative to the previous configuration. \$\endgroup\$
    – JustJeff
    Commented Dec 5, 2011 at 23:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes it does move cw/ccw in response to the commands. The two problems are occasional continuous run-on and what looks like not going to correct amount of hall counts in one direction. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 5, 2011 at 23:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ How is this a electronics problem? Looks like you need to call customer support for the software. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 5, 2011 at 23:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ The thing is the software has not changed, only the motor and it's integrated hall sensors have changed. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 5, 2011 at 23:48
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Why are the waveforms so different? | IF the motor was running at the same speed in each case then you (obviously) have serious differences. It it was not then yo should say so and say what the speeds are. | If you hand rotate the motor and look at the hallsignals OR power rotate the motr and use the hall signals to trigger a stroboscope, are the signals occurring PHYSICALLY at the same separations and phas relationships as before \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    Commented Dec 6, 2011 at 1:57

5 Answers 5

2
\$\begingroup\$

If commutation points of Hall sensors have a phase error It will adversely affect control in one direct over the other. Check with low voltage the torque vs Hall transition point, which directs polarity of drivers.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Check your motor specs. I know you don't have them yet but it could be what is causing your issues is that your motors specs are not the same. Thins to look for:

$$ J_m, k_t $$

Your motors moment of inertia could be higher and your motors torqu constant could be lower meaning your motor doesnt have the same power draw and takes longer to spin up.

rember

$$ T = k_t*I_m $$ where Im is your motor current... something to check out is how much current is your system drawing if its the same as your previous motor this tells you if there is an efficientcy issue.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

The problem must be the positioning of hall sensors. Tray adjust the positioning angle of them.

Renato.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Each motor may have different number of pole pairs. Hall effect sensors sense degrees of an electric cycle, which may correspond to different angle of revolution. If in old motor you had 2 pairs and in the new one you have 10, you will move five times slower.

\$\endgroup\$
-1
\$\begingroup\$

there are two basic hall sensor configs 60 degree and, if i recall it right, 180 degree. The only other two explanations are that of the coils miss alignment in radial or axial direction (front/back), or miss functioning hall board (inside of motor). The first one is dispatcher error (common). The second and third are mayor production errors (not so common). "it can't be what is impossible to be"

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Your answer needs serious detailing and Grammatical improvements \$\endgroup\$
    – User323693
    Commented Feb 1, 2017 at 8:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.