5
\$\begingroup\$

I have a THS4221 evaluation module (THS4221EVM, schematic on pg 1-3) powered with a bipolar +/-5V supply.

My function generator (AtelierRobin F125) is generating a nice 1 MHz square wave, which I have verified with my GDS-1102A scope. I have the square wave hooked up to the input of the THS4221EVM, and am monitoring the floating output (VOUT in the THS4221EVM schematic) through the second channel of my GDS-1102A scope (high impedance input).

The output voltage on the THS4221EVM takes a long time (~250 nS) to settle at the final value after each voltage change in the square wave. It initially slews very quickly, but slows down as the it approaches the target voltage.

If I connect VOUT to ground so R5 (935 ohms) becomes the output load, and measure at U1_1, the output is as expected.

Why is the performance affected in this way when there's no load?

Strangely, TI's hookup diagram (pg 2-1 in the manual) for this evaluation board says to connect the output directly to a scope, but if the opamp doesn't work properly with no load, then why is it setup that way? Even with a load on VOUT, I have to manually probe the circuit to measure the opamp output since the VOUT connector is after R5.

EDIT: TI's hookup diagram makes sense now; I missed where the 'scope is referred to as a "50-ohm monitoring instrument". They expect the connection to provide a 50-ohm load, but my scope has a high-impedance input. A 50 ohm termination resistor would provide the load.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Are you connecting output directly to input of scope with high impedance ? If you use a cable, or probe, then it is not completely direct connection, because propagation of square wave over cable to a high impedance input can involve resonances of cable itself. Or more likely if it is the probe + cable + divider, then chain is not correctly compensated/tuned. \$\endgroup\$
    – user924
    Commented Sep 1, 2012 at 3:46
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Rocket, yes, I'm connecting directly to a scope with high impedance. Now I realize why I thought TI's hookup diagram is strange; I didn't see that they referred to the scope as a "50-ohm monitoring instrument". TI expected the connection to provide a 50 ohm load, but I have a high impedance input and there is no termination load. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 4, 2012 at 17:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Series8217 Be sure to post answer to the question as an answer and accept it. \$\endgroup\$
    – AndrejaKo
    Commented Sep 4, 2012 at 18:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ @AndrejaKo my question is not yet answered. I know that my 'scope input is high-impedance. My confusion about TI's hookup diagram was secondary to my primary question, which is: why does an op-amp performs poorly with no load? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 4, 2012 at 19:13

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

Well I'll hazard an answer and say that the problem to me looks like output capacitance of the opamp and the board traces. The description of the way the voltage settles to me looks like charging and discharging of a capacitor. Very quickly at first and then slower and slower as the voltage settles. I'd almost describe that as exponential function.

The evaluation board documentation says quite clearly that the minimum load is 1000 ohms and that is reached on the board using 953 ohm resistor which should be placed in series with the 50 ohm resistor of the measurement device.

From the schematic, we see that the resistor R6 "does not apply" to THS4221EVM board, so I'd take that to mean that it isn't there (BOM says so too). The result of that is that we have nothing to drive the output signal to the ground, so what we have is remaining basically a capacitor (Take a look at the PCB layers. Which circuit component consists of two parallel plates? And what do the ground planes and the trace near R6 look like?), which, well, behaves exactly like a capacitor should behave. You have a resistor formed using op-amp's output resistance, resistance of the traces and the R5 through the capacitor consisting of the output trace and ground plane. I'd say that it's capacitance is around 250 pF, but I'm not experienced enough to claim that the number is correct.

Now about the bad performance of the board side: First, what are you going to do with an op-amp whose output is floating? It's basically useless! I'd say it's reasonable to exclude such usage scenario when we're constructing a device.

Cases where the input impedance of the next stage of the circuit is high enough so that it seems that the op-amp is floating are special. High impedance circuits require experience to make properly and countless factors (such as parasitic capacitances and inductances everywhere) need to be taken into account. For that reason, we have the R6 pads. If we do place R6 and connect the op-amp to a high impedance circuit, well have a high impedance in parallel with low impedance. The result which op-amp sees is going to be lower than the lower of the two impedances and the op-amp will be able to swing the voltage quickly, since by decreasing the impedance, we decreased the time constant of the parasitic capacitor circuit we have here. If we placed R6 there all the time, even when the next stage has low input impedance, we'd be providing unnecessarily high load on the op-amp and we'd be wasting power too.

Also note that all characteristics in the datasheet are made with load resistor of 499 ohms, unless otherwise noted (and settling times do use that resistance)!

\$\endgroup\$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.