Why the integrations of left and right domain are not done and be said enough to calculate the composed capacitance of 2 capacitors?

$$\ \theta ~~\text{is assumed to be small} \$$

The conductive rectangle exists which depth is $$\a\$$ and the length is $$\2l\$$ and it has been bent and grounded as the above diagram.

And the conductive rectangle KL exists which depth is $$\a\$$ and the length of it is $$\b\$$

The distance between the origin and the leftmost side of KL is $$\x\$$

We can assume that there is 2 capacitors are connected parallelly in the diagram.

$$\ C=2 \int_{x }^{x+b } \frac{ \epsilon_{0} a }{ x \tan \left( \theta \right) } \,dx ~~ \leftarrow~~ \text{composed capacitance} \$$

Currently I can't get the above equation.

Firslty I introduce you the below formula which calculate the capacitance which each plate is not parallel(size and form is same) using infinitesimal capacitors.

This formula assuming that the plate is seperated by infinitesimal plates and the composed capacitance is calculated connecting the each infinitesimal capacitors parallely.

$$\ C=\int_{0 }^{a } \frac{ \epsilon_{0} b }{ y(x) } \,dx \$$

$$\ a:= \text{width of the plate of capacitor} \$$

$$\ b:= \text{depth of the plate of capacitor} \$$

$$\ y(x):=\text{function which returns the distance between the plates as }x ~\text{proceeded from the leftmost side of the plate} \$$ $$\ ~ \$$

So bringing back

$$\ C=2 \int_{x }^{x+b } \frac{ \epsilon_{0} a }{ x \tan \left( \theta \right) } \,dx \$$

and think appyling the formula to it.

The current problem for me is that of the denominator $$\x \tan \left( \theta \right) \$$

Since the range of integration $$\ \left[ x,x+b \right] \$$,I guess that this integration only summing up the infinitesimal capacitors of range between the each edge of the capacitor KL

Is this integration really calculating the composed capacitance?

Why the integrations of left part( left from KL) and the right domain(right from KL)

are not done?

What I've been missing?

• "This formula assuming that ... capacitors parallely.". 1 where did you find this formula? Please provide a link. 2 Is $\theta$ assumed to be small angle? 3 IMO, the integration from $x \rightarrow x+b$ is only correct under the assumption of parallel lines of electric field; which is a reasonable assumption when $\theta$ is small angle.
– AJN
May 28 at 11:51
• Yes,$\theta$ is assumed to be small. May 28 at 12:05

For your configuration, the electric field is not parallel due to the non parallel arrangement of the plates and difference in plate lengths. The figure drawn shows a very exaggerated non parallelism; I think. However, if the angle $$\\theta\$$ is small, the plates can be assumed mostly parallel and the electric field lines between the conductors can be assumed parallel without introducing much error in the result. for mostly parallel plates, the method of breaking it up into smaller capacitors is correct method.
For large angles $$\\theta\$$, the result obtained this way will have significant error. For such cases you need to solve for the actual shape of the electric field and integrate appropriately.