I need to find the Thevenin Equivalent left of the >> symbols. Due to the lack of voltage sources I tried finding the Norton Equivalent first and came up with \$Rn=R_O\$, \$v_{th}=i_S \cdot R_O\$. Is that correct? If not how does one handle this case?
-
\$\begingroup\$ It is trivial to go from Norton to Thevenin and vice versa. \$\endgroup\$– OldfartCommented Apr 11, 2018 at 15:51
-
\$\begingroup\$ Also, I guarantee you that \$R_N = R_O\$ is incorrect. You haven't accounted for the VCCS, which is configured to act just like another resistor in parallel with \$R_O\$. \$\endgroup\$– The PhotonCommented Apr 11, 2018 at 15:55
-
\$\begingroup\$ -oldfart; I know but doing that in this case yields a result which is independent of g, so i suppose i am missing something \$\endgroup\$– ManouilCommented Apr 11, 2018 at 15:56
-
\$\begingroup\$ what you've tried is correct but it's just an intermediate result: a Thevenin source connected to a dependent current source. Now use it to determine short circuit current and open circuit voltage \$\endgroup\$– CurdCommented Apr 11, 2018 at 15:57
-
\$\begingroup\$ Can you find the open-circuit output voltage and short-circuit output current of the circuit? \$\endgroup\$– The PhotonCommented Apr 11, 2018 at 15:58
1 Answer
To find Rth, open circuit all independent current sources, short all independent voltage sources.
Connect a fictitious 1V source at the open ckt terminal.
Find the current driven by 1V source.
If I is the current driven by 1V source, then \$\frac{V}{I} = \frac{1}{I}\$ is the load seen by the voltage source. i.e., Rth. $$I = I_{Ro} + gv_x$$ vx = voltage across Ro = 1V $$\implies I = \frac{1}{Ro}+g = \frac{(1+gRo)}{Ro}$$ $$\therefore R_{th} = 1/I = \frac{Ro}{(1+gRo)} $$
- To find Vth, go back to the original ckt.
Vth is the voltage drop across Ro which is same as vx.
- Write ohms law equation for voltage across Ro $$(i_s-gv_x)Ro= v_x$$ $$\implies v_x = i_s\frac{Ro}{(1+gRo)} = V_{th}$$