0
\$\begingroup\$

I know that the dynamic power dissipation of a CMOS inverter is defined by the equation: Pd = (Cl)(Vdd^2)(fb). My teacher challenged us to find ways to reduce power dissipation besides the obvious ones (reduce bitrate, Vdd, etc.), and apparently the power dissipation is inversely proportional to the CMOS geometry. I'm assuming this is because changing the geometry will change the current through the MOSFET, but the current is proportional to W/L (where W is the gate width and L is the channel length). So if the power dissipation is inversely proportional, does that mean in relation to W or L?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ I believe that the Pd equation is missing the 1/2 coefficient. \$\endgroup\$
    – Daniel
    Commented May 1, 2018 at 2:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ It. Is correct. There is no ½ term \$\endgroup\$
    – jp314
    Commented Oct 1 at 4:03

2 Answers 2

1
\$\begingroup\$

In modern circuits the dominant power is C.V².f. Large ICs also have a lot of leakage current at elevated temperatures (sometimes exceeding the capacitive power. Sgoot theough power is usually negligible

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

You want to minimize the shoot-thru current during the time when both FETS are on. So make these FETS as weak as possible.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Can this be achieved by reducing the gate width as much as possible, or is it more efficient to increase the gate length? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 1, 2018 at 18:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.