# Impedance Matching Resistors on MII Ethernet Lines

Microchip is taking forever to activate my account so I will ask this here...

I am using the KSZ8081 PHY for MII Ethernet.

https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Microchip-Technology-Micrel/KSZ8081MNXCA?qs=sGAEpiMZZMvdy8WAlGWLcC4eczfQr1zYEy39QIyqxLk%3d

The evaluation board schematic has 33 Ohm impedance matching resistors on the RX MII signal lines but NOT the TX MII signal lines.

In past experience with other PHY chips (TI DP83848 specifically), there are series resistors on both the TX[0:3] and RX[0:3] lines.

Why does KSZ8081 not have them on the TX[0:3] MII lines? Would it be a good idea to include them or should I follow the evaluation board exactly?

Here is a screenshot of the KSZ8081 eval board schematic...

The RMII signals are treated as lumped signals rather than transmission lines; no termination or controlled impedance is necessary; output drive (and thus slew rates) need to be as slow as possible (rise times from 1–5 ns) to permit this. Drivers should be able to drive 25 pF of capacitance which allows for PCB traces up to 0.30 m. At least the standard says the signals need not be treated as transmission lines. However, at 1 ns edge rates a trace longer than about 2.7 cm ${\textstyle {\big (}{\frac {1ns}{5.9{\frac > {ns}{m}}}}\cdot {\frac {3.7m}{0.0254m}}\cdot {\frac > {1}{6}}=4.115m{\big )}}$, transmission line effects could be a significant problem; at 5 ns, traces can be 5 times longer. The IEEE version of the related MII standard specifies 68 Ω trace impedance. National recommends running 50 Ω traces with 33 Ω (adds to driver output impedance) series termination resistors for either MII or RMII mode to reduce reflections.[citation needed] National also suggests that traces be kept under 0.15 m long and matched within 0.05 m on length to minimize skew.