# What is an op-amp's differential input impedance?

I've heard of differential voltages, but the concept of a differential impedance is new to me.

Suppose we are trying to calculate/derive the differential input impedance of the following difference amplifier:

Then what would that mean and how would we go about that?

Pages such as this give information about the impedance seen at the inverting and non inverting inputs to the op-amp but they make no mention of the differential impedance, which leaves me stuck looking for answers. This post is very similar and gives us the answer R1 + R2 (which in our case is really R1 + R3), but there is no explanation of how we arise at that result, and this is where 'im stuck.

Thank you for any help and have a nice day.

The differential input impedance is R1 + R3.

That is because the op-amp actively makes sure via the feedback R2 that both V+ and V- nodes at the op-amp have identical voltages.

Therefore, as V1 terminates via R1 into voltage V-, and as V2 terminates via R3 into voltage V+, and as V+ and V- are identical voltages, there will be V1-V2 over the sum of resistors R1 and R3, and that is the differential impedance.

As an example, let's use the circuit to measure say a 3V battery. One battery terminal, say the positive, is connected to V1, and the other battery terminal, the negative, is connected to V2.

As the battery is a completely floating voltage supply, i.e. it shares no common reference with the supplies of the op-amp or the ground symbol, the measured battery voltage is completely differential.

So, V1-V2 is the battery voltage, 3V. Again, op-amp keeps V+ and V- equal, no matter what V+ and V- are. So there is definitely a 3V drop over resistors R1 + R3 only. Thus, what voltage there is at V+ is, and thus what is the current through R4, has no role in the differential impedance at all.

• Ok that's making more sense. My question now is that why isnt the resistor R4 coming into play at all? It divides the voltage supplied by V2 so it would indicate the presence of R4 has some impact on the voltage seen at V+, so why isnt it part of the differential input impedance? Commented Apr 6, 2021 at 19:05
• Good question. I will edit it into my answer. Commented Apr 6, 2021 at 19:07
• Thank you for the update, makes sense now. Commented Apr 6, 2021 at 19:33
• My understanding of "input impedance" is how much impedance the voltage source expects to experience from going into and eventually exiting the circuit, and it is calculated by looking at the load and calculating the resistance across the open terminals that send the input in and vomit the ground out. Is my understanding of this incorrect? Because I'm not sure how my understanding of input impedance relates to this answer. Commented Dec 14, 2023 at 16:06
• @HFOrangefish I am not able to understand your explanation. Differential input impedance is simply the ratio of input voltage divided by input current, if you for example stick a 9V battery there. Commented Dec 14, 2023 at 17:34

For common mode impedance balance reasons R1 and R3 should be the same value (call it R): -

And, given that both inputs are resistively terminated at the same voltage (Vx), due to op-amp action and negative feedback, the differential impedance is 2R.

But, if you ignored the CM impedance balance requirement the input impedance is R1 + R3.

• Ok, thank you. Am I right in saying that R4 is not in the final result because R4 directly controls the value of Vx, and since both V+ and V- have the same voltage (Vx) the 'effect' of R4 is present in both inputs, and so when we take the difference it gets lost? Commented Apr 6, 2021 at 19:08
• You can regard both inputs as being connected to Vx via their respective resistors R1 and R3. Nothing else matters. Don’t forget, that a proper diff amp has both those resistors as the same value to cancel common mode noise. Commented Apr 6, 2021 at 19:27
• And R4 becomes part of the common mode impedance equation rather than anything related to differential input impedance. Commented Apr 6, 2021 at 19:33
• Thanks for the follow up, makes sense now. Commented Apr 6, 2021 at 19:34