1
\$\begingroup\$

In a chapter pertaining to feedback and oscillator circuits in the textbook "Electronic Devices and Circuit Theory" by Boylestad and Nashelsky, there is a derivation for the output impedance with feedback of a current series negative feedback amplifier. This is the relevant circuit: [Current-series feedback connection]

Since we are using a negative feedback circuit, we have \$V_i = V_s - V_f\$. To find the output impedance with feedback, we short the supply voltage, thus \$V_s = 0\$ and \$V_i = -V_f\$. But the book says \$V_i = V_f\$, producing the correct expression, which is \$Z_{of} = Z_o(1 + \beta A)\$. But in the previous section discussing the \$Z_{of}\$ of voltage series feedback, where the feedback signal is similarly connected in series to the input signal, it uses \$V_i = -V_f\$. Why is this so? Also, how to intuit the change in input/output impedance due to feedback in different feedback topologies, respectively?

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

0
\$\begingroup\$

For your 2nd part -- the intuitive understanding of impedances in feedback.

When the feedback is measuring VOUT, then it will tend to regulate that value -- for a voltage, that is similar to saying it has a low impedance --> the amplifier will reduce the open-loop impedance.

When it is measuring IOUT (as in your diagram), then the feedback will regulate that, and regulating the value of a current means increasing its output impedance.

When the feedback signal is a voltage (it's a from a transresistance here), then it tends to (with a high gain amplifier) drive the amplifier's input voltage to 0, even when a signal is applied -- this means it 'looks' like the input impedance of the amplifier is low.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ that makes sense, thank you. but could you also clarify the first part? i don't understand why the diagram shows the output current flowing out of the amplifier the way it does. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 11 at 15:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ The polarity of the inputs to the feedback network isn't documented - need a + and - on that part \$\endgroup\$
    – jp314
    Commented Nov 12 at 17:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.