7
\$\begingroup\$

In a lecture about satellite sounding our professor explained how microwave radiance is measured typically on satellites: There is an antenna behind a parabolic mirror and the received signal is further processed. enter image description here

Up so far I thought that the receiver just filters the temperature-noise signal for a certain band, lets say with a bandwidth of 1 GHz around a middle frequency of 60 GHz (by whatever means). The radiation (antenna) temperature is then proportional to the measured power P within that band:

$$P = kT \cdot \Delta f$$

Without being an expert in microwave technology that was my picture in mind for a long time. But then he explained that the antenna counts photons: In a noisy signal from time to time we have peaks above the background noise level- and those peaks are photons, which are counted like in a Geiger counter. For me this "counting of photons" is totally weird in the context of microwaves and it contradicts my first view, where just spectral noise-power is registered continuously. I'm very (!) surprised, that we can detect single microwave photons in such way and couldn't find any literature where it is described.

Is it really true, that a simple system like that can detect single photons? I heard about single microwave photon detection experiments, but they are extremely sophisticated and are based on other principles:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209592732100726X

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030399219316500/pdfft?md5=d0533449e4b2d2e3bae779bc604a8070&pid=1-s2.0-S0030399219316500-main.pdf

\$\endgroup\$
2

3 Answers 3

7
\$\begingroup\$

No, microwave antennas cannot "detect" (and I'm using "detect" as a very loose euphemism... It's really "conversion"...) microwave photons because their energies are too low and get lost amid thermal noise. However, specialized quantum devices, like a superconducting qubit, could do the trick. But I'm waaaay too underqualified to talk about quantum information theory and further questions on that might be outside the realm of focus for this branch of Stackexchange.

Detecting single microwave photons is a significant challenge due to their extremely low energy compared to photons at optical frequencies. A conventional microwave antenna operates on classical electromagnetic principles and interacts with microwave radiation by inducing oscillating currents, which are then amplified and processed. This process involves a large number of photons and is inherently insensitive to individual photon events.

\$\endgroup\$
10
\$\begingroup\$

No, the system cannot distinguish individual photons.

A single photon at, say, 10 GHz has an energy of about 6.62607015×10−24 J. A barely-detectable radio signal has a power of about 1 femtowatt, or 10-15 J/sec, which represents (10-15 J/sec)/(6.62607015×10−24 J/photon) = about 1.8×1018 photons/sec.

While the antenna can be thought of as interacting with individual photons, there's simply no way that you can detect the effects of a single photon buried in the midst of all the other photons.

Your instructor is not doing you any favors by describing the process in this way. The electrical signal you get from an antenna arises from the statistical properties of vast numbers of photons, only some of which represent the desired signal. It is far more useful to think of it in terms of relative field strengths in fields and voltage/current levels in wires. The purpose of the antenna is to convert from one to the other.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is what I have thought. I think that the professor was a bit confused and I will ask him for that again. \$\endgroup\$
    – MichaelW
    Commented Nov 22 at 12:12
3
\$\begingroup\$

An antenna doesn't detect anything: it delivers electromagnetic energy to a receiver. So your question really should be "can a microwave receiver detect single microwave photons".

The answer is yes! Using a very exotic "receiver", physicists have "counted" 173 MHz photons.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is the correct answer: the other answers [at time of comment] seem to deny that this is possible, but that is a very peculiar statement when photons are definitionally the quantum of electric field -- any signal, noise or otherwise, is photons. That leaves the case of actually detecting them, which is indeed possible; albeit at increasingly greater lengths as frequency goes down. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 23 at 6:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think you've strayed rather far from the question, which is about how communication receivers operate, and whether a measured peak in the antenna signal can be attributed to a single photon, which is clearly "no". @TimWilliams: The other answers are not wrong. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dave Tweed
    Commented Nov 23 at 15:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ @DaveTweed For an undefined amplifier and receiver, detecting single photons is demonstrably possible (as above); this directly contradicts a claim such as "no, the system cannot distinguish individual photons". The statistics of room-temperature noise are also consistent with the reception of a very large number of photons, which one can very reasonably describe as "detecting single photons" by way of their collective effect. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 23 at 20:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ @TimWilliams Actually, the statistics of room-temperature noise don't match photon statistics at microwave frequencies. For frequencies $$<<kT/h$$ (about 6 THz at room temperature), thermal fluctuations of classical wave modes match electromagnetic noise. At higher frequencies, photon statistics dominate (Einstein's fluctuation formula). \$\endgroup\$
    – John Doty
    Commented Nov 23 at 23:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ I mean in the sense of, QM predicts the behavior in both quantum and classical regimes; the one can be reduced to the other under suitable limits. (Unless QM has been broken some time in the last 15 years since I learned about it--?) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 24 at 1:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.