1
\$\begingroup\$

Here is a PI compensator implemented using a OP-AMP. However, I'm wondering why Gc(s) = - vc/v, instead of vc/v. Not quite sure why there is a negative sign here since Gc(s) is defined as vc/v if I'm not mistaken. Compesnator.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ There is no doubt that the polarity is -ve \$\endgroup\$
    – D.A.S.
    Commented Feb 17, 2020 at 2:40
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The circuit shown is the easy way to make an integrator with an op amp. This leads to a sign inversion. I guess the writer of your book figures that there will be another opportunity for a sign inversion in some other part of the feedback path. (Of course, you need negative feedback to get good control, not positive feedback) \$\endgroup\$
    – user69795
    Commented Feb 17, 2020 at 4:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ Where does it say that \$G_c(s)\$ is defined as \$\frac {v_c}{v}\$? \$v\$ is applied to the inverting input. \$\endgroup\$
    – Chu
    Commented Feb 17, 2020 at 12:04

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

What you've shown is called a type 2 compensator. There are three compensator types which can "boost" the phase from 0 to 180° at the selected crossover frequency \$f_c\$. You can adjust the phase boost by spreading the zero(es) and the pole(s):

  • Type 1, a simple integrator (pole at the origin), no phase boost.
  • Type 2, a pole at the origin, a zero and a pole. Phase boost up to 90°.
  • Type 3, a pole at the origin, two zeroes and two poles. Phase boost up to 180°

In your example, in ac analysis, the reference voltage biasing the non-inverting pin is supposed to be perfect. Therefore, \$\hat{v}_{ref}=0\$ and pin (+) is grounded: enter image description here Because of the virtual ground brought by the feedback network, the inverting pin is a also 0 V in ac and resistance \$R_{lower}\$ disappears from the picture for \$s\$ greater than 0. For \$s=0\$ then the resistive divider is back in place considering open capacitors and the op-amp operated in open-loop conditions.

As you can see, this is an inverting configuration whose transfer function is \$G(s)=-G_0\frac{1+\frac{\omega_z}{s}}{1+\frac{s}{\omega_p}}\$. Please note that \$G_0=\frac{R_2C_1}{R_1(C_1+C_2)}\$ and has the dimension of a gain [V]/[V] owing to the presence of the inverted zero factorization which is, in my opinion, the adequate low-entropy form of the type 2 transfer function. The argument of this type 2 circuit is -270° or 90° at low frequencies.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.